ACCA BT: diversity and equal opportunities in hiring
This outcome covers how organizations promote diversity and avoid unlawful discrimination when recruiting and managing staff. The examiner likes it because scenarios ask you to name the type of discrimination and spot a practice that quietly excludes a group.
The rule
Direct discrimination is less favorable treatment because of a protected characteristic. Indirect discrimination is a neutral rule or practice that puts a group at a disadvantage and cannot be justified. Harassment is unwanted conduct that creates an intimidating or offensive environment. Victimisation is less favorable treatment because someone made or supported a discrimination complaint. Every requirement in a person specification must be genuinely related to the job, and recruitment channels should reach all groups.
Worked example
A call-center role is office-based with no stock handling. The draft person specification includes: fluent local language, order-entry software skills, query-handling experience, and the ability to lift 25 kg.
Test each item against the duties:
- Language: needed to speak to customers, so justified.
- Software: needed to process orders, so justified.
- Experience: relevant to the duties, so justified.
- Lifting 25 kg: no stock is handled, so there is no job-related reason.
The lifting requirement could exclude disabled people, some older people and more women. That is a neutral rule with a group disadvantage and no justification, which is indirect discrimination. Remove it.
Remember: indirect discrimination needs no bad intent, because a neutral rule or practice (such as hiring only through staff referrals or an unneeded physical requirement) is enough if it disadvantages a group without job-related justification.
Where candidates lose marks
Calling a refused promotion after supporting a colleague's complaint direct discrimination, when it is victimisation (treatment because of the complaint, not the person's own characteristic).
Assuming an imbalanced workforce proves deliberate discrimination, when the cause may be an unintended practice such as word-of-mouth recruitment.
Accepting low cost as a reason to keep a recruitment method that has a discriminatory effect.
Try it: 4 questions
Velvet Leaf Chocolates Ltd has an employee who gave evidence supporting a colleague's sex discrimination complaint. She is later refused a promotion by the manager named in that complaint, apparently because of her support. How should the treatment of this employee be classified?
Answer: D. Victimisation is less favourable treatment of a person because they have made, or supported, a discrimination complaint (a 'protected act'). The refusal of promotion is a response to her support for the complaint, so it is victimisation. Direct discrimination is wrong because the treatment is not because of her own protected characteristic, but because of the complaint. Indirect discrimination is wrong because no neutral rule or practice is disadvantaging a group. Harassment is wrong because the issue is a refused promotion, not unwanted conduct creating an intimidating or offensive environment.
Solar Co, a solar panel installer, finds that 70% of its staff are aged 25-35, although the local labour market is evenly spread across age groups. Most vacancies are filled through staff referrals. Which TWO of the following are the most appropriate conclusions?
Select the two that apply (each shows on its own).
Answer: B, D. Word-of-mouth recruitment through staff referrals tends to reach people similar to current employees (here, mostly aged 25-35), so it perpetuates the existing profile. This may be indirect discrimination even if nobody intends it. The implication is to widen recruitment channels so that all age groups see the vacancies. Option A relies on a stereotype with no evidence. Option C jumps to deliberate (direct) discrimination, which the data does not show. Option E ignores the equal opportunities problem; low cost does not justify a method that has a discriminatory effect.
Hillside Dairy Cooperative is drafting a person specification for a customer service adviser. The role is office-based and handles orders and queries from customers by telephone and email; no stock is handled. Which requirement is the LEAST justifiable on genuine job-related grounds and so most likely to lead to discrimination?
Answer: B. Requirements must be genuinely related to the job. The role is office-based with no stock handling, so a lifting requirement has no job-related justification and could unfairly exclude disabled people, some older people and women, risking indirect discrimination. Language fluency is wrong because the adviser must communicate with customers, so it is clearly job-related. Previous experience of handling queries is relevant to the duties. Software use is needed to process orders, so it is also justified.
Northway Buses Co advertises a vacancy for a depot planning analyst. The advert states that applicants must be 'recent graduates'. Older candidates with equivalent experience but no recent degree are deterred from applying. Which type of discrimination does this most likely represent?
Answer: B. Indirect discrimination occurs when a provision, criterion or practice that looks neutral puts people sharing a protected characteristic (here age) at a particular disadvantage and cannot be justified as necessary for the job. 'Recent graduate' does not mention age, but in practice it excludes older candidates, so it is indirect. Direct discrimination would be wrong because that requires explicit less favourable treatment because of age itself (e.g. 'under 30s only'), and the advert does not say this. Victimisation is wrong because nobody has made or supported a complaint. Harassment is wrong because there is no unwanted conduct that violates someone's dignity or creates a hostile environment.
5 more BT questions on this outcome, free for life
The full ACCA BT bank, mock exams and written questions marked against the scheme. Email only, no card, no trial.
What is the difference between direct and indirect discrimination?
Direct discrimination is treating someone less favorably because of a protected characteristic. Indirect discrimination is applying a rule or practice to everyone that in effect disadvantages a group and cannot be justified.
What is victimisation in employment?
Victimisation is less favorable treatment of a person because they made or supported a discrimination complaint (a protected act). An example is refusing a promotion because the employee gave evidence for a colleague.
Why is recruiting through staff referrals a diversity problem?
Referrals tend to reach people similar to current employees, so they reproduce the existing workforce profile. Organizations should widen recruitment channels, such as advertising externally in varied media, so all groups see vacancies.